CIRS Product Support
Multi-Purpose, Multi-Tissue Ultrasound Phantom

Multi-Purpose, Multi-Tissue Ultrasound Phantom

Model 040GSE


The Model 040GSE Multi-Purpose, Multi-Tissue Ultrasound Phantom is a sturdy, reliable phantom for testing the imaging performance of ultrasonic systems. The phantom is made of CIRS’ proprietary Zerdine® hydrogel polymer, which has been formulated to provide tissue mimicking properties under B-mode ultrasound and other features such as harmonic imaging. To maximize phantom lifetime, this gel is contained in a rugged ABS plastic housing with a Saran-based laminate membrane.

The Model 040GSE has two attenuation zones to allow use over the widest range of transducer types possible. The high attenuation zone ensures that even low-frequency probes (5 MHz and below) do not penetrate to the bottom of the phantom when measuring penetration depth. The low attenuation zone allows high frequency probes (greater than 5 MHz) to image key testing targets within the first 4 cm of the phantom. This combination allows testing of most transducers in clinical imaging frequencies from 2 to 20 MHz, and, unlike other phantoms with lower attenuation values, this phantom complies with IEC Technical Standard 62736.

CIRS is certified to ISO 13485:2016 standards. We have an in-house test facility to measure acoustic properties of materials. In addition, ultrasound imaging systems are used to inspect each phantom. Every ultrasound phantom that CIRS distributes has passed thorough testing during manufacture and completion to ensure the highest quality product available. A Certificate of Compliance is issued with each phantom.


Dimensions: 17.8 cm x 12.7 cm x 20.3 cm (7″ x 5″ x 8”)
Phantom Weight: 11 lbs.(4.1 kg)
Housing Materials: ABS Plastic
Membrane: Saran-based laminate
Tissue-Mimicking Material: Zerdine® solid elastic hydrogel

Model 040GSE Includes:
Multi-Purpose, Multi-Tissue Ultrasound Phantom
Detachable Protective Cover
Detachable Water Well (1cm deep)
Detachable Endocavity Well
Carry Case
48-Month Warranty
User Guide

Freezing point: 0° C
Melting point: Above 100° C
Speed of Sound: 1540 m/s
Attenuation: Low: 0.7 dB/cm/mHz; High: 0.95 dB/cm/mHz
Other: Compatible with harmonic imaging

Number of targets: 16
Wire diameter: 100-micron, nylon monofilament
Depth range: 1 to 16 cm
Spacing: 10 mm

Number of groups: 2
Wire: 100-micron, nylon monofilament
Depths: 4 & 9 cm
Number of Targets: 6 & 7 respectively
Spacing: 10 & 20 mm respectively

Number of targets: 5
Wire Diameter: 100 microns
Depth range: 1 to 5 mm
Distance b/w Targets: 1 mm


Group 1: 1.5 cm deep, Ø 6 mm
Group 2: 5 cm deep, Ø 8 mm
Elasticity*: Soft, medium & hard
Grayscale Contrast: -3 db with respect to background
*Modulus values are nominal; details are available upon request.

Wire diameter: 80 microns
Group 1&2 Depths: 3 & 6.5 cm
Axial separation: 4, 3, 2, 1, 0.5 & 0.25 mm
Lateral separation: 4, 3, 2, 1, 0.5 & 0.25 mm
Group 3 Depths: 10.5 cm
Axial separation: 5, 4, 3, 2 & 1 mm
Lateral separation: 5, 4, 3, 2 & 1 mm

Number of targets: 12
Diameter of targets: 1.3, 2.0, 3.0, 4.5, 6.7 & 10.0 mm
Depth of Targets: 1.5, 4.5, 7.0, 10.0, 13.0, 16.0 cm
Contrast: Anechoic, Cyst-like

Group 1: 3 cm deep, Ø 8 mm
Contrast: -9 dB, -6 dB, -3 dB, +3 dB, +6 dB & > +15 dB with respect to background
Group 2: 11.5 cm deep, Ø 10mm
Contrast: -6 dB, -3 dB, +3 dB, +6 dB & > +15 dB with respect to background

Handling and Care

With proper care, this phantom will withstand years of normal use. Below are some guidelines to follow.

Scan Surface: The scanning surface is the most important item on the phantom to protect. It can withstand normal scanning pressure but DO NOT press on the scanning surface with your fingernails or any other sharp objects. If the scanning surface becomes damaged, seal the phantom in an airtight container and IMMEDIATELY contact CIRS for return authorization. Call 800-617-1177, email at [email protected] or fax RMA Request form to 757-857-0523.

Cleaning: The phantom may be cleaned with mild soap and water ONLY. Avoid solvent- based, alcohol-based, or abrasive cleaning agents. For longest life, the phantom should be cleaned after each use.

Storage: Store at room temperature in the provided carry case. The primary concern is gel desiccation due to loss of water vapor through the membrane. In addition, the thermal stresses associated with the freeze/thaw cycle may cause the gel to crack or damage the housing integrity, while extreme heat may accelerate water vapor transmission through the membrane. To minimize desiccation, always store the phantom in the air-tight carry case with the removable storage cover attached.

Maintenance: At least once a year, weigh your phantom and compare to original weight noted on certificate of compliance. If the phantom has lost or gained more than 1% of its original weight and you notice a difference in vertical distance measurements, or if the scan surface appears depressed, call CIRS at (800) 617-1177.

Material Safety: This product contains Zerdine, a non-flowing water-based, poly­acrylamide material which is fully sealed within the phantom housing. Zerdine contains trace amounts of the residual monomer acrylamide CAS#79-06-1. There are no known hazards when the phantom is used and stored as intended. Zerdine is fully cured and will not leak from the housing. Damage to the integrity of the housing may expose the user to trace amounts of acrylamide monomer. The amount is not sufficient to pose an acute health risk, but it is still advised to wear protective gloves if handling exposed Zerdine gel due to the potential long-term hazards of the monomer. It is also advisable to wash hands and all surfaces with soap and water after handling exposed Zerdine gel. Regulations regarding disposal of materials with trace acrylamide monomer vary by locality. Contact your local authority for instruc­tions. If assistance is desired in the proper disposal of this product, including accessories and components, after its useful life, please return to CIRS.

Phantom Certification

All CIRS ultrasound QA phantoms are inspected and certified at the end of manufacturing and are shipped with a Certificate of Inspection. Calibration or reinspection frequency is generally at the discretion of the user’s QA program protocols. CIRS offers the following recommendations for Zerdine hydrogel phantoms.

The acoustic properties of Zerdine hydrogels are very stable over time, but over time water vapor loss can slowly change these properties. The rate of vapor loss can increase when the housing is damaged, most commonly at the membrane surface. Premature desiccation can be checked by the customer by weighing the phantom annually. The original weight of the phantom is provided on the label and on the certification sheet. If minor weight loss is found (~1% and a flat membrane), the QA measurements made with the phantom are still valid, but the storage conditions should be adjusted to prevent further weight loss. Cooler, humid environments will slow the rate of water loss. We recommend increasing the humidity of the storage container by adding a wet sponge to the case. Use of an anti-microbial additive is recommended to prevent mold growth. Do not place the sponge directly on the membrane as this may damage the membrane. If signs of significant water loss are found (over2% or a visibly concave membrane), contact CIRS immediately for return instructions. In case of phantoms under warranty, the phantom will be repaired or replaced. Older phantoms may qualify to be rejuvenated for a fee.

Alternatively, CIRS provides reinspection for customers that do not wish to perform this assessment of phantom stability themselves or are concerned that the phantom may have been damaged. This re-inspection process consists of four steps:

  • Step 1 – Careful visual inspection of phantom housing, scanning surface and accessories for signs of damage
  • Step 2 – Weigh the phantom without lid attachments and compare to original weight noted on certificate of inspection to quantify any desiccation (if applicable)
  • Step 3 – Quote for repair, if applicable. Zerdine® phantoms can often be restored to their original condition by replacing the membrane and re-hydrating the gel inside. If the phantom cannot be repaired, or the cost is significant, CIRS will either apply the cost of reinspection to a replacement phantom or proceed with re-inspection of the damaged phantom as below. ATS Urethane phantoms, due to the stability of the material, rarely need repair. When they are damaged (usually due to tearing or rough handling), repair is generally not feasible.
  • Step 4 – Thorough inspection with a diagnostic ultrasound system to identify any defects and confirm integrity of all targets. This is the same as the final image quality inspection each phantom undergoes prior to being sold to the customer.
  • Step 5 – Generation of formal inspection report noting inspection results, special observations and manufacturer’s “opinion” regarding suitability for use. Final decision on usability resides with the customer, as each user sets different inspection criteria.


All standard CIRS products and accessories are warranted by CIRS against defects in material and workmanship for a period as specified below. During the warranty period, the manufacturer will repair or, at its option, replace, at no charge, a product containing such defect provided it is returned, transportation prepaid, to the manufacturer. Products repaired in warranty will be returned transportation prepaid.

There are no warranties, expressed or implied, including without limitation any implied warranty of merchantability or fitness, which extend beyond the description on the face hereof. This expressed warranty excludes coverage of, and does not provide relief for, incidental or consequential damages of any kind or nature, including but not limited to loss of use, loss of sales or inconvenience. The exclusive remedy of the purchaser is limited to repair, recalibration, or replacement of the product at manufacturer’s option.

This warranty does not apply if the product, as determined by the manufacturer, is defective because of normal wear, accident, misuse, or modification.


If repairs or replacement not covered by this warranty are required, a repair estimate will be submitted for approval before proceeding with said repair or replacement.


If you are not satisfied with your purchase for any reason, please contact Customer Service or your local distributor prior to returning the product. Visit to find your local distributor. Call 800-617-1177, email [email protected], or fax an RMA request form to 757-857-0523. CIRS staff will attempt to remedy the issue via phone or email as soon as possible. If unable to correct the problem, a return material authorization (RMA) number will be issued. Non-standard or “customized” products may not be returned for refund or exchange unless such product is deemed by CIRS not to comply with documented order specifications. You must return the product to CIRS within 30 calendar days of the issuance of the RMA. All returns should be packed in the original cases and or packaging and must include any accessories, manuals and documentation that shipped with the product. The RMA number must be clearly indicated on the outside of each returned package. CIRS recommends that you use a carrier that offers shipment tracking for all returns and insure the full value of your package so that you are completely protected if the shipment is lost or damaged in transit. If you choose not to use a carrier that offers tracking or insure the product, you will be responsible for any loss or damage to the product during shipping. CIRS will not be responsible for lost or damaged return shipments. Return freight and insurance is to be pre-paid.


900 Asbury Ave,
Norfolk, Virginia, 23513 USA


48 Months


General Guidelines for Performing Measurements

Performing measurements

It is recommended that all measurements be performed at the most frequently used imaging arrangements. The importance of these tests is to make sure that system performance remains constant over an extended period of time. Measurements may also be used to compare the performance of various setups of the same machine or to compare different machines in a quantitative manner.

The following are general steps for imaging all targets:

  • Some wires will appear as short lines rather than dots. When using the electronic calipers, always take measurements from a point on one echo to the same point on the next (i.e., center to center). Otherwise, errors may be introduced.
  • If a convex probe is used, center the target within the scan plane in order to minimize degradation and distortion introduced on the outer edges of the probe.
  • When assessing vertical distance measurements, DO NOT press on the scanning surface. Pressure on the scanning surface causes the wires to become temporarily displaced, making vertical distance measure- ments inaccurate.
  • When assessing horizontal distance accuracy, ensure that the scan plane is perpendicular to the horizontal target group. Rotation of the probe will result in inaccurate distances.
  • Always be sure the phantom is scanned while at room temperature. A phantom just received may be colder or hotter than room temperature de- pending on where it was stored during shipping. Temperature affects the speed of sound and, ultimately, the perceived measurements. The phantom should be stored at room temperature for at least 24 hours before use to ensure its core temperature is correct.
  • The most accurate measurements will be made with the phantom 22˚C ± 1˚C (70˚F–73˚F).

Use of Removable Well and Covers

The phantom is shipped with the protective cover attached to the phantom. This can be removed by stretching the elastic latches on either side of the phantom up and off of the protective cover. The included water well and covers are easily secured to the phantom with these same rubber latches. Simply place the water well or cover on top of the phantom and stretch the elastic latches up and over the attachment point on either side of the accessory.

Coupling gel can be applied directly to the scan surface. This option is best used with linear transducers. For curved arrays, the water well may be attached and filled with water to provide better coupling. Side Fire transducers can be particularly challenging to scan with a standard phantom. CIRS has designed a removable endocavity cover for these transducers. When this accessory is attached, the phantom should be placed on its back and the cover should be filled with water.

Establishing a Baseline

Before performing routine quality assurance measurements, establish:

  1. System settings for each measurement: System setup can have a dramatic impact on the results obtained from quality assurance measurements. You must establish and record what system settings should be used for each of the quality assurance tests. These same settings should be used each time the test is performed. If not, then the conclusions drawn may not be valid. CIRS recommends that you use the most commonly used settings for the type of probe tested- i.e. the liver preset values for an abdominal probe–which are called a “normal” technique in the sections that follow.
  2. Baseline measurements: The first set of measurements taken will be the baseline measurements for the combination of system settings and phantom. Record the system settings and phantom serial number used to acquire each measurement along with your measurement results. On subsequent scans, refer to the baseline results to determine if the ultrasound system has drifted to an unacceptable level. It is each facility’s responsibility to establish the magnitude of drift allowed before corrective action is warranted.
  3. Allowable deviation from baseline measurements: The difference between the original baseline measurements and subsequent measurement should be calculated and recorded. At some point the difference will be large enough that some action is required (call service, replace system, etc.). Each facility needs to determine the action level for each test. You should refer to the user’s manual of your ultrasound scanner and note the stated accuracies of the system’s general imaging measurements. These stated ac- curacies may greatly influence the conclusion made when evaluating the ultra- sound system. For example, if the measurement accuracy for your system is 10% for distances up to 2 cm, the scanner may detect 2.0 cm as being any where from 1.8 cm to 2.2 cm and still be functioning properly. The user is responsible for establishing action levels.

Test Procedures

Instructions for performing each of the quality assurance tests are listed below.

Subsequent columns provide the frequency of testing recommended by different standards bodies. To obtain detailed information about the associated standards, select the hyperlinks below:

 Watch instructional video

Background: Inspection of the ultrasound scanner condition, and periodic cleaning and maintenance, is required by all major standards bodies.

Measurement Procedure: Check the following machine components:

  • Control panel for dirty or broken switches and knobs, burnt out lights
  • Scanner housing for dents and cosmetic damage
  • Display is clean and free of scratches
  • Wheels allow easy maneuvering of cart & are seated securely; wheel locks are functional
  • Power cords & plugs are free of cracks and discoloration
  • Dust filters should be clean and free of lint/clumps of dirt

AIUM accreditation standards also recommend the following cleanliness and safety practices:

  • Immediately: clean any spill of bodily fluids or hazardous materials
  • At the end of each exam: clean gel from ultrasound machine control panels
  • Daily:
    • Clean monitors and inspect for cracks
    • Check for damage to power cords or PACS connections
    • ID and report improper operation of switches or knobs on console
    • ID and report any burned-out indicators lights
    • Clean rooms for dust, dirt and infection control
  • Weekly:
    • Clean dust from machine console air filters
    • Check machine for dents and other damage
  • Monthly:
    • Thoroughly clean ultrasound machine console and other equipment in the exam room

These routine checks can be added to the QA Portal as part of a separate test lineup, or they may be documented elsewhere and audited during your annual survey.

Testing frequency:
ACR: Annual (Semi-annual recommended)
AIUM: Quarterly
AAPM: Daily
IEC TS 62736:2016: Monthly

Watch instructional video

Background: Inspection of the ultrasound scanner condition, and periodic cleaning and maintenance, is required by all major standards bodies.

Measurement Procedure:

  • Check the transducer surface & housing for cracks, separations, and discolorations
  • Check the cable for damage

AIUM accreditation standards also recommend the following cleanliness and safety practices:

  • Immediately: clean any spill of bodily fluids or hazardous materials
  • At the end of each exam: clean gel from transducers
  • Daily:
    • Check transducer cables for damage
    • Check transducer surface for cracks, separations, or discolorations

These routine checks can be added to the QA Portal as part of a separate test lineup, or they may be documented elsewhere and audited during your annual survey.

Testing frequency:
ACR: Annual (Semi-annual recommended)
AIUM: Quarterly
AAPM: Daily
IEC TS 62736:2016: Monthly

Background: AAPM Ultrasound Task Group 1 report recommends checking scanner display performance by inspecting a suitable greyscale test pattern. If it is possible to load a test pattern to your machine, AIUM recommendations allow assessment using the greybar on the display. Users may also want to consider adding more rigorous luminance measurements to the test protocol. For more information, see the “ACR-AAPM-SIIM Technical Standard for Electronic Practice of Medical Imaging.

ACR requires testing the display for both the ultrasound scanner (the primary interpretation display) and for secondary displays (such as at a PACS terminal). Secondary display performance is not included in the default settings of the QA Portal, as maintenance of these displays is typically managed by another department.  If not, a new test procedure for secondary displays should be added to the QA Portal.

Measurement Procedure:

  1. Check that the brightness and contrast controls are at their baseline settings
  2. Pull greyscale test pattern (such as a SMPTE or AAPM TG-18 pattern shown in figures 1-2) and count the number of visible steps.
  3. Is the alphanumerical information on the display sharp?
  4. Luminance ratio = Luminance of the brightest grey level divided by luminance of darkest grey level. This requires a luminance meter.
SMPTE test pattern
SMPTE test pattern
AAPM TG18-QC test pattern
AAPM TG18-QC test pattern
Testing frequency:
ACR: Annual (Semi-annual recommended)
AIUM: Quarterly
AAPM: Daily
IEC TS 62736:2016: Monthly

Watch instructional video

Background: Image uniformity tests are performed to ensure that all transducer crystals and associated electronic circuitry are functioning properly. In this test, transducers are rated on the following scale adapted from the AIUM Quality Assurance Manual for Gray Scale Ultrasound Scanners:

  1. No streaking
  2. 1-2 minor shadows
  3. 1 serious shadow or 3+ minor shadows
  4. Multiple serious shadows

Transducers with a rating of 1 or 2 are still operational, and those with a rating of 3 should be used with caution and replaced when possible. Transducers rated 4 should be immediately removed from service. Any images that show defects should be archived to the PACS system for future reference so that any changes to performance can be noted during future tests. Note that this procedure is designed primarily to detect vertical banding in the image caused by damaged transducer elements or wiring, which is the most common source of failure in ultrasound systems. Horizontal banding, although less common, is another potential source of error. This may be difficult to detect during this procedure due to the limited depth of field; it should also be checked during contrast resolution measurements. Horizontal banding is caused by failures in the system circuitry, focusing or image processing software, and is less common than vertical streaking due to bad transducer elements. As the most common source of system failure, optional semi-annual checks of image uniformity are recommended.

Measurement Procedure:

  1. Minimize depth of field (about 4 cm) to ensure good spatial detail near the transducer surface
  2. Place the focus near the transducer surface
  3. Apply couplant and place the transducer on the phantom, preferably over a region with as few targets as possible.
  4. Test transducer as described in the sub-sections below and rate the level of streaking found on the 1-4 scale described previously.

Testing Curved Transducers:

With the transducer properly positioned, slowly rock the transducer side-to-side to ensure all elements are tested. Figure 1 shows an of how to position the transducer, while Figure 2 shows the resulting set of images, extracted from a cine loop.

Figure 1 Positioning a curvilinear transducer for image uniformity measurements
Images extracted from a cineloop when rocking the transducer from side to side to test for image uniformity
Figure 2 Images extracted from a cineloop when rocking the transducer from side to side to test for image uniformity

Note that defects due to poor coupling will move as the transducer moves, while vertical streaks due to transducer defects will stay in the same place as the transducer moves. Customers may want to consider purchasing CIRS’s Model 551 Uniformity Phantom as a low-cost tool facilitate uniformity testing. The compliant, uniform material used to make this phantom allows conformal coverage of all transducer elements, making it easier to identify stationary dead elements from coupling artifacts. Figure 3 shows this phantom alongside an image from a transducer with a simulated dead element.

Uniformity testing using the CIRS Model 551
Figure 3 Uniformity testing using the CIRS Model 551

Testing Flat Linear Probe:

Place the imaging array flat on the phantom surface and slide the transducer forward and back to change the background speckle pattern. The speckle should move, while any artifacts will remain stationary. An example image is shown in figure 4.

Uniformity testing of a small parts probe with a flat linear array
Figure 4 Uniformity testing of a small parts probe with a flat linear array

In figure 5, a defective transducer has been simulated by affixing several wires to the transmitting surface.

Linear probe with simulated dead elements
Figure 5 Linear probe with simulated dead elements
Testing frequency:
ACR: Annual (Semi-annual recommended)
AIUM: Quarterly
AAPM: Annual
IEC TS 62736:2016: Monthly (in-air), Bi-annual (phantom)

Background:  Many ultrasound transducers form 3-D images by mechanically scanning the transducer in the depth, and some low-cost “wobbler” devices form 2-D images by mechanically scanning a single transducer element.  These devices require more frequency testing of geometric accuracy in the mechanical scan direction due to the higher potential for mechanical failures/mis-calibration.

The accuracy of these devices can be tested by scanning the probe in the direction of the horizontal pins.  The pas

Measurement Procedure:   

  1. Obtain an image of the horizontal pins, so that the pins appear as a series of dots. For 3D transducers, this may require rotating the probe 90° with respect to the standard imaging plane. 
  2. With calipers, measure the distance between the furthest spaced horizontal pins in the image and note the pins used in the measurement.
  3. Record measurements on the QA portal. Note:  Pin distances may vary from phantom to phantom.  Pass/fail decisions should be based on a deviation from baseline, not against the nominal values provided in the phantom specification. The default pass/fail criteria for these measurements were obtained from the AAPM Ultrasound Task Group 1 Report for horizontal pins.

Testing frequency:
ACR: Semi-annual recommended
AIUM: Quarterly
AAPM: Annual
IEC TS 62736:2016: Bi-annual

Watch instructional video

Background:  Standard geometric accuracy measurements are made in the vertical and horizontal directions.  The most accurate measurements are obtained when the pins are spaced as far apart as possible.  The measurement procedure below provides tips for transducer placement to ensure as many pins as possible are placed in the field of view of the transducer.  Note that mechanically scanned transducers (as found in some 3D probes and low-cost “wobbler” devices) require more frequent testing in the scan direction due to the potential for failures in the mechanical scanner.  A separate test procedure has been written for these transducers.

Measurement Procedure:   

  1. Obtain an image of the vertical and horizontal pins. Adjust the depth of field to obtain an image with as many pins as possible.  You may need to position the vertical pins slightly off-center to get as many horizontal pins as possible in the image.  Figures 1 and 2 provide examples for an abdominal probe and a small parts probe.
  2. With calipers, measure distance between the 1st pin and last visible vertical pin
  3. With calipers, measure the distance between the furthest spaced horizontal pins in the image
  4. Record measurements on the QA portal. Note:  Pin distances may vary from phantom to phantom.  Pass/fail decisions should be based on a deviation from baseline, not against the nominal values provided in the phantom specification. The default pass/fail criteria for these measurements were obtained from the AAPM Ultrasound Task Group 1 Report.
Figure 1 Geometric accuracy measurements for an abdominal probe
Figure 2 Distance measurements for a small parts probe
Testing frequency:
ACR: —
AIUM: Quarterly
AAPM: Annual
IEC TS 62736:2016: Biennial

Watch instructional video

Background:  System sensitivity is measured by determining how deep in a phantom echo signals from background scatterers can be detected on the display.  For this reason, the test is often called the maximum depth of penetration or the maximum depth of visualization.  Sensitivity measurements, because they provide an important measurement of system performance, are recommended as part of the annual survey, in compliance with ACR Ultrasound Accreditation Requirements and the recommendations of the AIUM.  AAPM recommends more frequent quarterly testing of sensitivity.

Measurement Procedure:

To measure depth of penetration, users look for the depth where the brightness of stationary speckle matches the brightness of the moving electronic noise.  This depth will vary based on system settings, particularly transducer frequency, gain and the attenuation in the phantom being tested.  For this reason, the following adjustments to the general system settings may be needed:

  • Depth of field: Adjust the depth setting high enough to ensure that the maximum depth of penetration is visible.  For abdominal probes, this should be approximately 20 cm, while for small parts probes a depth of approximately 6-8 cm is needed.
  • Focal depth: The focus should be in the region where the speckle signal matches the noise signal.  Note that this will be a moving target, as the speckle brightness will increase as the focus is moved deeper.
  • Attenuation zone: The 40GSE has two attenuation zones. When testing abdominal probes, it may be possible to reach the bottom of the low attenuation zone before obtaining the maximum depth of penetration.  In that case, switch to the high attenuation zone.

After adjusting the settings, follow these steps:

  1. Eyeball the position where the speckle and noise brightness matches
  2. Use electronic calipers to measure the distance between the transducer surface and this position, as in figure 1.

Note that many users are tempted to measure the position of the last visible wire target in the vertical target group, but wire targets are considerably brighter than the speckle texture, and therefore are not a sensitive indicator of transducer performance.

Figure 1 Example image from a system sensitivity measurement

A common objection to the method recommended above is that “eyeballing” the intersection between noise and speckle is subjective and therefore prone to error.  For a more quantitative measurement, the maximum depth of penetration can be measured using a number of image analysis programs such as ImageJ or MatLab.  To do so, a phantom image and an image taken while the transducer is in air (and cleaned of all coupling fluid) are needed.  Next, measure the median speckle brightness as a function of depth in both images, you can find the intersection of the speckle brightness against the noise floor.  In many systems, the noise floor is quite low, and it is not possible to find this intersection.  In that case, you may consider multiplying the noise floor by a factor of 1.4.  An example plot from this measurement, is shown in figure 2 below.  In this example, the depth of penetration is 24 cm.

Figure 2 Example quantitative assessment of system sensitivity, obtained in MatLab

The default pass/fail criteria for depth of penetration measurements was obtained from the AAPM Ultrasound Task Group 1 Report, with a variance of 0.6 cm from baseline indicating a monitoring condition, while a variance of 1 cm indicating a failure.  Those wishing to loosen the criteria may wish to conduct a study to determine measurement variance associated with “eyeballing” the depth of penetration value.  A high measurement variance may be used to justify a looser pass/fail criteria.

Testing frequency:
ACR: Annual
AIUM: Quarterly
AAPM: Annual
IEC TS 62736:2016: Biennial

Watch instructional video

Background:  Contrast resolution, sometimes referred to as functional resolution or low-contrast detectability, is a test of an imaging system’s ability to detect and display the size, shape, and depth of dark, or anechoic, target structures.  This test indicates the smallest diameter target a system can resolve at a given depth.

When performing this test, anechoic targets should appear circular with sharp, clearly defined edges, and be free of any observable shading (echo fill-in).  Possible sources of echo fill-in include poor resolution (which causes speckle from the echogenic background to spread out into the anechoic target), internal system noise, the presence of side lobes in the ultrasound beam, and defects in the image processing architecture.   Figure 1 provides a good example of echo fill-in.

Figure 1 The 8 mm targets in the ATS 539 appear to shrink with depth as speckle in the background fills in the target. Other sources of fill-in include electronic noise and side-lobes in the ultrasound beam profile.

When imaging anechoic targets, bright echoes may be observed at the top and bottom of anechoic targets, as shown in figure 2. These echoes are normal specular reflections and do not present a problem. 

Figure 2 The bright echoes at the top and bottom of these contrast targets in the 54GS phantom are due to specular reflection at the interface between the target and the background. These are normal and do not indicate a problem with the system.

Contrast resolution testing also provides a good opportunity to check for horizontal banding in the image, a uniformity artifact caused by problems with the system software or electronic circuitry.  While this problem is rare, horizontal banding can be missed in the Image Uniformity & Artifact Survey due to the limited depth of field used in that procedure.

Measurement Procedure:

In the Model 40GSE, contrast resolution is measured using anechoic stepped cylinders, whose diameters change as the transducer moves along the width of the phantom (figure 3).  

Figure 3 Layout of the anechoic stepped cylinders in the Model 40GSE

The procedure for measuring contrast resolution in the 40GSE follows:

  1. Position the transducer over the anechoic target structures so that a pair of round targets are visible at each depth.
  2. Scan along the length of the cylinder to determine the size of the smallest cylinder visible for the first pair of targets (1.5 cm deep). While scanning, examine the image for geometric distortion and areas of non-uniformity, particularly horizontal banding.  Freeze and save images for any detected artifacts.
  3. At each depth, save images showing the smallest detectable cylinder at each depth. Record measurements in QA portal.
  4. If artifacts were detected during step 2, repeat the scan at a different location to rule out a defect in that region of the phantom. If the artifacts are still present, repeat the scan using a different gain and focal setting. Be sure to save images of any artifacts found.  Finally, document your findings in the “Distortion Assessment” field of the QA portal and make a pass/fail decision based on the clinical significance of the finding.  This may require consultation with the system manufacturer and the physician in charge.
Testing frequency:
ACR: Annual is recommended
AIUM: Quarterly
AAPM: Annual
IEC TS 62736:2016: Biennial

Watch instructional video

Background:  Axial resolution measures how close two objects can be in the depth direction of the ultrasound beam while still being detected as two distinct objects. Axial resolution is proportional to the length of the system’s transmitted ultrasonic pulse or pulse length. 

Lateral resolution is like axial resolution, except in the width direction.   Lateral resolution will improve with a narrowing beam width, with the lowest value found at the beam focus.

The Model 040GSE has three combined axial and lateral resolution target groups. The first two groups, found at depths of 3 cm and 6.5 cm, consist of 6 wire pairs spaced at intervals of 4, 3, 2, 1, 0.5 and 0.25 mm (see figure 1).

Figure 1 Wire spacing for axial / lateral targets set at 3 cm and 6.5 cm depth

The third target group, found at a depth of 10.5 cm, has 5 wire pairs spaced at intervals of 5, 4, 3, 2 and 1 mm (figure 2).

Figure 2 Wire spacing for axial / lateral targets set at 10.5 cm depth

Measurement Procedure:

  1. Apply couplant and position the transducer above the axial resolution targets in a vertical plane. (The wires should appear as dots, not lines).
  2. Align the probe so that all the targets are displayed at their maximum intensity level and adjust the focus to match the depth of the targets assessed. The image should appear as in figures 3-4 below
  3. Freeze and save the image
  4. Determine the last pair of axial wire targets to be distinguished as two separate entities and record the value
  5. Determine the last pair of lateral wire targets to be distinguished as two separate entities and record the value
Figure 3 Image of the first axial-lateral target group obtained with a Philips L12-4 probe. Note that the focus is set at the same depth as this set of wire targets.
Testing frequency:
ACR: Annual is recommended
AIUM: Annual
IEC TS 62736:2016: Biennial

Watch instructional video

Background:  Elevational resolution is defined as the ability of an ultrasound system to resolve closely spaced objects along the thickness direction of the ultrasound transducer.  For this reason, elevational resolution is often called slice thickness.  Slice thickness is typically much coarser than axial and lateral resolution as most ultrasound transducer arrays are mechanically focused in the thickness dimensions. 

Elevational resolution can be assessed by rotating the transducer 45° with respect to the vertical wire targets, as described first by Skolnick[1].  Note that this measurement also contains information about lateral resolution, due to the 45° transducer rotation, and therefore provides an estimate of elevational resolution only.

Measurement Procedure:

  1. Apply couplant and orient the transducer to obtain an image with the vertical target wires in the center. Be sure to adjust the tilt of the transducer so that the wires are lined up in a vertical column.
  2. Rotate the transducer 45°, being careful to keep the tilt of the transducer so that the wires are still lined up in a vertical column. A 45° angle may be eyeballed or, for more precision, the horizontal wires may be used a guide to judge the angle of rotation.  The distance between horizontal pins will increase by a factor of 1.4 when the transducer is rotated 45°. 
  3. Adjust the focus to match the depth of the pin with the smallest width, so that the transmit/receive focus matches the fixed elevational focus.
  4. Freeze the image and measure the length of key wire segments with the electronic calibers, as in figures 1-2. The most important wire to include in this set is the smallest wire segment, the depth of which defines the elevational focus of the transducer.

Save the image and record the measurements.

Figure 1 Elevational resolution measurement on a Philips C6-2 transducer. The fourth wire measured, at a depth of 10 cm, indicates the location of the elevational focus.

[1] Skolnick, ML. “Estimation of ultrasound beam width in the elevation (section thickness) plane.” Radiology. 1991 Jul;180(1):286-8.

Figure 2 Elevational resolution measurement on a Philips L12-4 transducer. Here, the third wire measured at a depth of 3 cm, indicates the location of the elevational focus.
Testing frequency:
ACR: Annual is recommended
AIUM: Annual
IEC TS 62736:2016: Biennial

Watch instructional video

Background:  Beam profile measurements (sometimes called focal zone or lateral response measurements) are used to assess the shape of the ultrasound beam, a key factor in determining system resolution.  The narrowest region within the beam profile occurs at the focal point.  This is also the region where beam intensity is greatest and the image brightness is at its peak. 

Measurement Procedure:

  1. Position the transducer so that the vertical wire targets are at the center of the image.
  2. Adjust the focus as desired and freeze the image
  3. Measure the width of five key wires in the column with the electronic calipers and save the image
  4. If performing the measurement as part of acceptance testing, record the wires measured and the focal depth on the QA portal.
  5. Record the width of each wire measured.
Figure 1 Example beam profile measurement, performed on the ATS 570
Testing frequency:
ACR: —
IEC TS 62736:2016: —

Watch instructional video

Background:  To create greyscale images in B-mode ultrasound, the ultrasound scanner converts the amplitude of echoes received by the transducer to brightness values on the display.  The range from a just noticeable echo at the lowest grey level to the maximum echo brightness at the highest is referred to as the displayed dynamic range or greyscale contrast sensitivity. 

In the Model 040GSE contrast sensitivity can be evaluated using 2 different greyscale target groups. The first group, at 3 cm depth, has grayscale contrast levels relative to the background ranging from –9 dB to +6 dB, plus a hyperechoic target (approximately +9 dB). The second group, at 11.5 cm deep, provides grayscale contrast of -6 dB, -3 dB, +3 dB, +6 dB, and a hyperechoic target. A procedure for qualitative evaluation of greyscale contrast, which is closely rated to displayed dynamic range, is described in the section below.

Alternatively, IEC Standard 61391-2, section 7.2.4,[1] describes a quantitative method for estimating local dynamic range.  This method requires off-line analysis of the digital image to measure the mean pixel intensity within the ROI of each greyscale target.  This intensity is then plotted against contrast level in dB, and a linear regression is performed to obtain the equation of the line of best fit, y = mx + b.  This equation is then used to obtain the echo contrast level x for y = 1 (minimum greyscale intensity) and y = 255 (maximum intensity).  The difference between these two values is the local dynamic range. 

Measurement Procedure:

  1. Apply couplant and position the transducer so that the greyscale targets appear as a circular region as in figures 1-3 below
  2. Freeze and save the image
  3. Note which targets are clearly visible in on QA portal. Use the notes to comment on the appearance of the lesion, particularly those that are noticeably distorted (not circular) or blurry.  Targets should have a clear progress in brightness from low to high based on the contrast levels. 
Figure 1 Hyperechoic, +6, +3 targets, as imaged with a small parts probe. The +3 dB target is not clearly visible

[1] IEC 61391-2:2010 :  Ultrasonics – Pulse-echo scanners – Part 2: Measurement of maximum depth of penetration and local dynamic range.  Section 7.2.4, “Estimating local dynamic range using backscatter contrast.”

Figure 2 -3, -6 and -9 dB targets, as imaged with a small parts probe. All targets are clearly visible
Figure 3 Both sets of greyscale targets, as imaged with an abdominal probe.
Testing frequency:
ACR: —
IEC TS 62736:2016: —

Watch instructional video

Background:  The near field group of wire targets is used to assess the distance from the front face of the transducer to the closest identifiable echo.  This region is commonly referred to as the “dead zone” or “ring-down distance,” as this region it is characterized by one or more bright echo lines that block out the image.  Modern ultrasound systems have a very small dead zone, and as result this measurement would typically be performed only during acceptance testing.

Measurement Procedure: 

  1. Obtain an image of the near field targets as shown in figure 1. (This image is from the 54GS. The number of pins visible will vary depending on the phantom used.)
  2. With the electronic calipers, measure the distance from the transducer face to the closest resolvable wire target.
  3. Record the distance. Note that the actual dead zone is smaller than this distance. (The closest pin, by virtue of being visible, is outside the dead zone.) 
Figure 1 Dead zone assessment using the 054GS
Testing frequency:
ACR: —
AIUM: Annual
IEC TS 62736:2016: —


The Model 040GSE provides elasticity targets for the next generation of ultrasound imagers using elastography. The elasticity value for the background is 20 kPa. The target group at a depth of 1.5 cm as a diameter of 6mm, while the target group at 5 cm has a diameter of 8 mm. Both groups provide elasticity values of 10, 50 and 100 kPa. These targets are suitable for qualitative assessment of sonoelastography systems, and for checking system performance over time.

Note: Due to the limited spatial resolution of some shear wave elastography systems, the modulus readings of the elastography targets may get averaged with the modulus of the background. In this case, you may want to test your readings against the 040GSE background (nominal modulus of 20 kPa) or obtain the Model 039 Shear Wave Elastography set. The modulus readings provided are tested using a stress/strain compression stand based on ASTM standard D575-91, and your readings may differ slightly due to differences in test methodology. For more information, refer to the following reference: Oudry J, Lynch T, Vappou J, Sandrin L, Miette V. “Comparison of four different techniques to evaluate the elastic properties of phantom in elastography: is there a gold standard?” Phys Med Biol. 2014 Oct 7;59(19):5775-93.

Measurement Procedure:

  1. Apply coupling gel to the scanning surface or fill the water trough with tap water.
  2. Position the transducer above the elasticity targets and perpendicular to the wires.
  3. In sonoelastography mode adjust the instrument settings.
  4. Change settings to acquire optimal images.
  5. Observe the general appearance of each targets. Note how well you are able to see each of the masses. Quantitative measurements based on the elastography color scale, or the shear wave speed reading, may be used for tracking the consistency of elastography measurements over time.
  6. Record your observations.
Testing frequency:
ACR: —
IEC TS 62736:2016: —